AI-generated feedback summary
- Responses
- 71
- Satisfaction
- 4.44/5
- Safety
- 4.20/5
- Overall ratings were very positive: pilots were highly satisfied with the task, while safety was also viewed favorably but with more recurring concerns.
- Task quality was widely appreciated, with comments praising the length, flow, staff, and enjoyable racing; several pilots still wanted more complexity, more route options, longer distance, and less straight ridge racing.
- Safety concerns centered strongly on the SSS/start: many pilots described two large gaggles converging head-on, a turn-back/180-degree situation near the start, and chaotic or risky crowding through the early part of the course.
- Weather and conditions were mentioned by a few pilots, including strong turbulence while waiting for the start and a suggestion to delay transport when conditions develop late; one comment noted the ridge-focused task was understandable given how the weather looked at takeoff.
- Pilot behavior feedback was mostly about crowded gaggle interactions, with several noting that the high pilot level helped manage tight situations; an isolated report described a mid-air contact or close contact before SSS over Costalunga involving pilot 374.
- Goal and landing feedback was mixed: several pilots felt trees near the goal line, free flyers, many wings, and a congested landing area created close calls and favored a round/cylinder or elevated goal, while a few explicitly preferred the normal ESS/goal and felt the site was not suitable for elevated goal.
- Organization feedback was generally positive, but several practical improvements were suggested: keep the safety frequency clear from jamming or free-flyer traffic, improve task-briefing communication at takeoff where reception is poor, consider ambulance presence at takeoff and landing, and reduce long waits for buses from landing back to HQ or the hotel.